Fake Ids Ontario London

Open Letter to MS Corned

Hello Mr. Solonin. After reading your article "the Sudeten crisis. The first attempt, I could not remain silent - So wanted to comment on your next achievement. Respond directly to your site, I can not because there spiteful Inquisition etching all dissent. But fortunately, I can write your answer here. This place is perfect: firstly, here, in contrast to your site, not for banyat deviation from the party line, and secondly, experience shows that you sooner or later becomes known all written here.

on this with rassharkivaniyami let me finish and get to the point.

first . I would like to comment on the following very important, a key piece of your article.

«What I want to make more, does not pretend even to be "hypothesis." This is, shall we say, vague guesses that are generated, however, the reading of original source documents. "

I am very glad that you finally got rid of the ill-fitting on you mask the historian and openly admitted to the readers, which is simply a blogger who shares his opinion about what goes into his hands. Such openness can only be welcome. This move just makes it impossible any substantive criticism of your address: because no one healthy self-respecting man would not seriously criticize the "wild guesses" one of the many bloggers.

Keep it up, Mr. Solonin! Fewer hypotheses and theories - more "vague speculation" and other brain juice. The main thing - to be irrefutable. Then your reader - the one that already has an opinion that coincides with your - will attract to you a new confirmation of his thoughts. And the rest you can safely put the bolt - Still the illusion of science, that you had tried to maintain, no one was fooled.

Among other things, a new style of presentation opens before you all rich "Uzbek method" to collect information. Thanks to him, you will be able to significantly expand their horizons and learn a lot "New" in the subject area of each of your article (sorry, post). Previously, you were deprived of such opportunities, because inadvertently presents itself as a person, well understand the issues. Down with this pernicious practice! Do not hesitate to confess to the reader that you know little about the subject of discussion. And then grateful commentators will give you a lot of new (to you) of the material, which will continue to generate the "vague speculation".


second . Let me express my admiration for the way you quickly picks up the leading global practice. Had not yet completed scandal Assange, and you are looking for an opportunity to copy his success: also publish (with Ed.'s corrections "TM) materials from the diplomatic correspondence. Coup, continue In the same spirit!


Last . To maintain your good initiative, I am on the Rights of the average man who owns the kitchen logic, a bit pokritikuyu your article your post. To have further convinced how useful are the following your steps in this field.

your opinion in quotes:

1. «The Soviet Union, ie Comrade. Stalin, did not intend to save Czechoslovakia, "repulse the fascist aggression" itp.
2. «geopolitical terms in September 1938 on the goals and objectives for main mechanisms for its implementation did not differ from the plan in August 1939 "(This, of course, about the Soviet Union.)
3. « fundamental difference between the actions of Stalin September 38 th and August 39 th only one - as a result. The first attempt was unsuccessful, the second - more than successful. »
4. « Purpose - The war in Western Europe bloody war of extermination, which would weaken the major European powers and turn them into easy prey fragments of Stalin. »
5. « main "tool" in achieving this objective - aggressive paranoid, who turned out (not without a secret backroom intrigues of Stalin) at the helm of power in Germany. »
6. « Prague (and not Paris or London), Moscow sought his false promises of assistance to provoke the adoption of the most rigid, uncompromising lines of conduct "(with respect to Germany).
7. «And if and when a war starts, France will have to enter it .[...] Just defeat Czechoslovakia (with the inevitable military conflict with the 80 millionth Germany) and the equally inevitable after the inclusion of Hungary and Romania into the orbit of the foreign policy of the Third Reich created in Europe, that powerful, geographically continuous aggressive bloc (Germany, Austria, Italy, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, very likely - Croatia and Bulgaria), to represent the very real threat to the very existence of France and its allies. »
8. « Chamberlain and Daladier had time to "get off the train, going downhill, "before the German-Czech border, sounded the first gun salvos»

Of course, none of these theses can not withstand any the least serious criticism ... but we do not know. After all, we already know that from the serious criticism of you left, abandoning the image of the historian. However, if you want have a reputation as a good blogger, you have to ensure internal consistency of the presented you (at least within a single post). And with that you do bad on it will work.

And the worst in this sense is, of course, the thesis № 7. Do you think happens: France was very afraid that Germany invaded Czechoslovakia, and it will create a powerful bloc in Europe ... etc. And why France gave Czechoslovakia without war. Hmm ... In the kitchen logic does not fit firmly, because giving Czechoslovakia without a fight, once France gets exactly what it claims was afraid to get in fails outcome of the war: a powerful territorial unit ...

And at the same time as the thesis of number 7 is the "key" that is, without it falling apart the whole structure of the insidious Stalin's plan, which may have been disrupted. Can not be left in the reasoning is so obvious contradictions. It is better not to write anything at all, or resort to reader, that is to give something like: "I do not know why France gave Czechoslovakia, Germany, but it has become unconditional defeat of Stalin, who wanted to drag France into war. " Huh? Simple and tasteful, and let interested foaming at the mouth refute ... especially since your loyal henchmen catch up and probably just settle kamentah in any suitable, high-quality motive for action in France.

So do not rest on his laurels, Mr. beef. Life do you imagine a new approach to simplify, but even here it is necessary to comply with at least minimal accuracy.